Archive | Action RSS feed for this section

NH Law Enforcers raid home of former NH Representative seeking recordings

Ridley breaks the news on the search of former State Representative Harriet Cady‘s home for an audio recorder by armed agents of the Deerfield Police Department on the Free State Project forums:

A pro-freedom, former state rep reports Deerfield police have entered her home to confiscate recording devices! This after she openly audio taped at a government building! [...] Her cheeky and bold bills in the early to mid oughts were an inspiration to me during my early days in New Hampshire.

I spoke to Cady today by phone. She says she’s been trying to do some sort of freedom of information request activity. Trying to tape that process apparently was what got her retaliated against. The recordings were made with an audio recorder, she says, not a video recorder. She also reports that she was recently kicked out of a town meeting. This was caught on video which is not yet uploaded.

Police successfully nabbed the only copy of the audio recording, from what I gather. A government attorney is refusing to release it, says Cady.

Here is the account that Mrs. Cady e-mailed to Dave Ridley:

On Feb. 9 about 3 PM my husband answered a loud knocking at our door. Two Deerfield Police officers, Dyermond and Hughes were there and told us they had a search warrant for my property. I aske dwhat for they gave me a copy and it said for my tape recorders, tapes and contraband. They were looking around and I said the tape recorders and tapes are in my car. (I needed to take to Molly sound to enhance the sould).

Deerfield, NH Law Enforcer Joel Hughes

Officer Dyermond took possession of my two hand held tape recorders and the four tapes. He then proceeded to search my car and pocketbook and then came back in the house to search the house. At that time Chief Greeley arrived and of course I was protesting this illegal search warrant. Dyermond and my husband went upstairs but Hughes said he was staying with me in the kitchen because we had a shotgun on the counter which my husband had taken out that morning so he could teach me to load and aim and shoot should someone try to break in.

Deerfield, NH Law Enforcer Daniel Deyermond

Shortly thereafter Officer Dyermond made out a receipt and put tapes and tape recorders on hood of the cruiser and at the same time I took pictures.

Later I went to Candia District Court to see the file on how they got a search warrant what was the complaint. The clerk said I couldn’t see the file till the date of return which is 7 days or the following Thursday.

I was to learn that our town administrator, Leslie Boswak swore out a complaint because when I went to the town office to get a copies of the Feb. 5th deliberative session CD’s which the modertaor had the chief remove me from the meeting hall, because I was trying to correct a lie by Selectman Steve Barry. I asked her for a reciept and when she wouldn’t give me one I tape recorded her refusal. She told me I couldn’t tape her without her permission and I said yes I can and thank you and left. Apparently shortly after I left her in the town offices she walked down to the police and wrote out a complaint about being recorded with out permission. The police then asked the county attorney could I be arrested for wire tapeing. He told the chief I could be according to the chief.

So as you can see the police asked for a search warrant not only for the tapes and recorders but for contraband (that word means smuggled goods) and I guess that’s why they continued searching even after they got the tapes and recorders.

Since her complaint was only to being tape recorded what right did the Judge have to sign a search warrant for contraband. The worse crime I have ever committeed is a stop sign violation.

So here I sit waiting to be arrested or in limbo waiting to find out what the Deerfield Police intend to do about their getting a search warrant.

Read full story
Video

Reports from the 420 Celebration at the NH State House

CONCORD – I stayed close to my desk today but Mike and his camera traveled to the capitol of New Hampshire and captured the annual 420 celebration. Everyone  seemed to be in good cheer, including the State Agents working security. One even accepted a hug as the celebrants exited the State House after singing Chronic Carols as a fun way to redress their grievances.

There are reports that after leaving the State House, several celebrants went to a nearby liquor store to sing more carols where a camera was attacked. I’ll post this video when I find it online.

Also the Terence McKenna inspired video by the YouTube channel Gram Rastag:

Read full story

A Commenters Appreciation for Brad Jardis (Mine too)

A recent commenter on the recent Free Keene post by Brad Jardis has some high praise for my legal agent and not such high regard for the men and women who are members of the New Hampshire Bar Association. The membership of what commenter Eric Davidson calls a “secret society” includes the judges and prosecutor, who both work for the State.

The Clerk of the Court mailed me a financial affidavit form to see if I qualified for a public defender, also a member of the New Hampshire Bar Association.

To me, there isn’t much difference between practicing law and black magic in the New Hampshire Court System, so I’m grateful that Brad Jardis agreed to represent me. As an 11 year veteran of New Hampshire law enforcement with a photographic memory for the law, he’s my best chance I have of finding justice inside New Hampshire’s legal monopoly. The system appears to be rigged so I’m not expecting miracles.

[Brad] who though formally untrained as “lawyer” is giving the chief law enforcement agent of the state a run for their money.

Furthermore, he has the guts that no lawyer has – to take on judges head to head. Find me even ONE bar member in N.H. who will do that – JUST ONE BAR MEMBER! If nothing else is accomplished, Brad just proved that the “secret society” N.H. Bar (which resembles the wizard of oz behind his curtain) is immune from all liability and he has exposed them for what they are.

Mr. Davidson then introduces us to the 2%:

And one additional thought: U.S. News and World Report ranked Franklin Pierce Law Center / U.N.H. Law school at #142 out of 145 for 2012. As we all know, the vast majority of lawyers and judges practicing in N.H. were trained at this bottom 2% joke of a law school. Therefore, it is safe to say that the N.H. Judiciary is run by the least capable legal minds in America!

And we wonder why there is corruption in N.H. – Give a bunch of 2-percenters a little bit of power and pride, and self-righteousness take over. They band together and tell each other that they are right – poof! Anyone who REALLY IS RIGHT, becomes wrong as a direct result of the ignorant majority’s logical fallacy!

You can show your appreciation by making a donation to the Jardis Justice Fund:

Read full story

Blatant Cases of Judicial Abuse Signal Need for Constitutional Amendments

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
March 19, 2012

Media Contacts:

Bradley Jardis, former police officer, 603-205-6003,bbraduma@gmail.com
Rep. George Lambert, R-Hillsborough 27, 603-809-5115,marchon@gmail.com
Rep. J.R. Hoell, R-Merrimack 13, 603-315-9002,jr@jrhoell.com

BLATANT CASES OF JUDICIAL ABUSE SIGNAL NEED FOR CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS
CACR 11 and CACR 22 Would Rein-In Judicial Overreach
and Restore the Balance of Power to the People of New Hampshire

KEENE, N.H.—Two state representatives and a former police officer are calling attention to the apparent abuse of power by a New Hampshire district court judge and other officials around him in an effort to showcase the need for two constitutional amendments designed to rein-in judicial authority that are planned for a House vote this week.

On Wednesday, the N.H. House is expected to vote on CACR 11, which would require the governor and council to reappoint judges every seven years, but only if they have exhibited good behavior. The House is also expected to vote on CACR 22, which would restore the Legislature’s full authority to control lawmaking in New Hampshire and limit the administrative rule-making authority of the Judicial Branch so that it is subject to Legislative approval—just like the current rule-making authority of the Executive Branch.<!–more–>

Both amendments are designed to reverse the impact of Part 2, Article 73-a of the N.H. Constitution, which the courts have used in many cases since the article’s enactment in 1978 to protect judges’ assumed authority within the courtroom and beyond to advance rules that have the “force and effect of law.” Some have even proposed that 73-a makes the Chief Justice the “administrative head” of the Legislature, which is also known as the “General Court.” The amendments would help restore the separation of powers required by Part 1, Article 37.

“We’ve seen judges write orders that directly violate the constitution’s freedom-of-speech, freedom-of-the-press or right-to-bear-arms provisions, and because of 73-a, those orders have the full ‘force and effect of law’ and put innocent people in jail,” said State Rep. George Lambert, R-Hills. 27. “I want to see us return to the New Hampshire I learned about in school, where judges make decisions that protect the rights of people based on the clear language of the state constitution. That’s why we need these two simple fixes to our constitutional language.”

Former Police Officer Bradley Jardis of Dover, N.H., is now acting as Attorney-in-Fact for Jason Talley of Keene, N.H., a journalist who was arrested for wearing a camera on his belt into a courtroom after a judge issued rules under Article 73-a that said no cameras carried by members of the public were allowed into the building. Talley argues that he was carrying the camera as part of his Part 1, Article 22 N.H. Constitutional right to the freedom of the press, a freedom that was recently upheld by the August 2011 Glik decision in the First Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. Yet, because the New Hampshire rules on cameras have the apparent “force and effect of law” under Article 73-a, Talley was arrested on charges of contempt, among other charges. The trial is scheduled for April.

Jardis isn’t stopping with the apparent abuse inherent in Talley’s case, however. He noted how the court rules regarding cameras that led to Mr. Talley’s arrest surfaced just three days after Keene District Court Judge Edward Burke was filmed on tape asking a Bailiff to arrest Adam Mueller of Keene for threatening him. Mr. Mueller spent two days in jail as a result of Burke’s accusation under RSA 640:3(b), Improper Influence. The problem with Burke’s assertion is that Mueller’s videotape shows the videographer simply asking the judge questions. On the video, Mueller politely asks Judge Burke about the judge’s decision to jail Beau Davis of Keene for five days on a contempt charge for simply refusing to remove his hat in Burke’s courtroom. Mueller is heard asking on the video, “Do you think people want to pay for someone to be in jail for five days for wearing a hat? It’s kind of ridiculous to waste taxpayer money on that, don’t you think?”

After his arrest, Mueller attempted to pursue Burke on a charge of False Reports to Law Enforcement under RSA 641:4, I, but that charge was never brought. Mueller says the event is a clear sign of a double standard when it comes to public officials. In his video chronicling the incident, he notes that he has a friend currently serving six months in jail for doing the same thing Burke was filmed doing.

Video of the Mueller incident is available at http://www.copblock.org/13976/doublestandard/ and video of the Davis incident is available athttp://www.copblock.org/5464/freebea/.

“I typically do not like the activism tactics of some of the people who confront Judge Burke and other officials in the Keene area, but as a former police officer, I find it inexcusable that government officials think they can get away with treating people so poorly simply because they are politically unpopular or annoying,” Jardis said. “I am willing to stake my reputation on this issue because I truly believe it is the right thing to do. After seeing this, it’s definitely time to amend 73-a and rebalance government authority so it protects the rights of the People.”

Rep. J.R. Hoell, R-Merrimack 13, who has been involved with Jardis’s latest efforts to call attention to judicial abuse, noted the recent action of Judge Timothy Vaughan in Grafton Superior Court in December. At the time, Judge Vaughan issued a restraining order against Bradley Jardis and Tommy Mozingo, and anyone associated with them, prohibiting them from lawfully carrying weapons onto any campus of the University System of New Hampshire under penalty of contempt. The judge also ordered Jardis and Mozingo to post a copy of the restraining order on a specific Web site, a violation of their freedom of speech.

“With 73-a in place, judges are assuming unbridled powers to order people to do practically anything they want them to do, and they are jailing many peaceful dissenters,” Hoell said. “This is a clear sign that the constitution needs amendment to fix this. At the same time, if we cannot amend the constitution, it may be time for the House to introduce charges of impeachment. It is clear to me that some judges are abusing the authority delegated to them, and their abuses include but are not limited to corruption, malpractice and maladministration.”

For more information, please contact the three media sources listed at the top of this press release.

Read full story
Video

I’m Featured in a Documentary on the “State of Liberty”

A film crew from Keene State College has decided to follow Keene area activists around, including myself, to capture this moment in history. They attended my last court hearing and recorded me multiple times despite being told by deputy sheriffs and bailiffs to stop. That experience probably helped the Freedom Speaks production crew understand the  threats that I face – now that they face them too. More at StateofLibertyFilm.com.

Read full story
Video

Jardis: Judges perpetrated cover-up for Burke (Ridley Report)

Read full story

State vs. Talley.TV: Motion to Dismiss

This Motion to Dismiss was drafted by Brad Jardis and  is available as a PDF or as a Google Doc.

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

CHESHIRE, SS SUPERIOR COURT

Case No. 213-2011-CR-00216
State v.
Jason Talley

Motion to Dismiss

Jason Talley moves this Honorable Court to dismiss all charges pending in the matter of case number 213-2011-CR-00216 due to the fact that the charges in this case originiated from rules enacted specifically to cover up and prevent future media coverage of criminal conduct committed by New Hampshire Judicial Branch officials. In support of this motion, Jason states as follows:

1. The New Hampshire Constitution in Part I, Article 22 reads as follows:
Free speech and liberty of the press are essential to the security of freedom in a state: They ought, therefore, to be inviolably preserved. (emphasis added)

2. The Marriam-Webster Dictionary defines “inviolable” as:

secure from violation or profanation
or
secure from assault or trespass : unassailable

3. On June 28th 2011, independent journalist Adam Mueller of CopBlock.org attempted to interview Keene Circuit Court Presiding Judge Edward Burke about his decision to use taxpayer funds to imprison a peaceful individual who chose to protest a ban on wearing some kinds of hats while sitting in his courtroom. The conversation about public policy and its enforcement by a public official (the video of which is viewable in its entirety at www.CopBlock.org/ImproperInfluence) is as follows:

Adam Mueller: “Judge Burke, can I ask you a few questions about a hat, and how that constitutes contempt?”
Adam Mueller: “You think people want to pay for someone to be in jail for five days for wearing a hat?”
Adam Mueller: “It’s kind of rediculious to waste taxpayer money on something like that, isn’t it?”
Adam Mueller: “Sir, I just want to have a conversation.”
Judge Burke: “Bailiff! Bailiff! This person is threatening me about a decision I just made.”
Adam Mueller: “I’m not threatening you. I’m asking questions.”
Judge Burke: “He’s threatening.” *points to Adam* “That’s a criminal offense.”
Bailiff: “Come on, sir, you’re in custody.”

4. Mr. Mueller, a member of the free press who was acting as such, was imprisoned for two days on the aforementioned false allegations made by Judge Burke for two days prior to the Cheshire County Attorney dropping the charges.

5. New Hampshire law makes it a criminal offense to falsely report that another has committed a crime to law enforcement authorities. The law, False Reports to Law Enforcement, is codified at RSA 641:4 and reads:

A person is guilty of a misdemeanor if he:

I. Knowingly gives or causes to be given false information to any law enforcement officer with the purpose of inducing such officer to believe that another has committed an offense; or

6. As a result of Judge Burke being seen publicly on the Internet telling a lie which resulted in an innocent man and member of the media being imprisoned for two days (and his resulting criminal investigation which has still yet to be concluded by the Sullivan County Attorney), Circuit Court Chief Judge Edwin Kelley abused his authority granted by the New Hampshire Supreme Court pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 54 (which was granted to the Supreme Court originally by the people of the State of New Hampshire through Part II, Article 73-a of the New Hampshire Constitution) by enacting Circuit Court Order 2011-03 on July 1st 2011, not more than one day after Mr. Mueller was released from state custody. By doing so, Chief Judge Kelley stripped citizens of this state of their federal and state constitutional rights to hold government officials accountable for not only public acts, but criminal acts, committed in public areas of a public building.

7. Circuit Court Order 2011-03 itself was so bold as to state that members of the public had “accosted the presiding justice(,)” a reference undoubtedly to Judge Burke’s false statements three days prior about Mr. Mueller’s constitutionally protected conduct which ended with him falsely imprisoned for two days.

8. As a result of the embarrassment Judge Burke faced by being seen publicly on video telling a lie (and his resulting criminal investigation which has still yet to be concluded by the Sullivan County Attorney), Superior Court Chief Judge Tina Nadeau abused her authority granted by the New Hampshire Supreme Court pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 54 (which was granted to the Supreme Court originally by the people of the State of New Hampshire through Part II, Article 73-a of the New Hampshire Constitution) by enacting an order on July 1st 2011 that enforced the provisions of Circuit Court Chief Judge Kelley’s order upon the Superior Court system. By doing so, Chief Judge Nadeau stripped citizens of this state of their federal and state constitutional rights to hold government officials accountable for not only public acts, but criminal acts, committed in public areas of a public building.

9. Presiding Justice John Arnold of the Cheshire Superior Court further expanded the order adopted by Superior Court Chief Judge Nadeau by enacting “Order In Reference To Administrative Order 2011-3” on July 15th 2011. This order outright banned the possession of any device commonly used by the media to hold government officials who wield tremendous power accountable to the people from whom they derive their power.

11. The first court order adopted by Chief Judge Kelley served as the root of a now poisonous tree which restricts constitutional rights through a total of three court orders specifically immediately issued following a criminal act committed by a judge being caught on camera.
12. Were Cheshire County Superior Court Presiding Judge Arnold’s order not in effect on the date of Mr. Talley’s arrest, Mr. Talley never would have been arrested as the bailiffs would never have taken issue with the innocuous possession of a recording device.

13. Mr. Talley believes the judicial orders issued by New Hampshire’s two chief trial court judges and the Cheshire County Superior Court Presiding Judge John P. Arnold represent an abuse of the public trust as they constitute an effort on the part of the Judicial Branch of the State of New Hampshire to ensure that any future criminal acts which result in the deprivation of liberty on the part of a citizen of this state never be caught on camera again.

Prayer for Relief
WHEREFORE, Jason Talley, requests this honorable Court to order the following relief:

Dismiss all charges pending in this matter; and
Grant any other relief this honorable Court deems just and proper.

Respectfully submitted,
Jason Talley

01/31/12 By
Bradley Jardis
42 Main Street #27
Dover, NH 03820

I hereby certify that on the above date, a copy of this motion was hand-delivered to Assistant Cheshire County Attorney John Webb.

Bradley Jardis

Read full story
Audio

State vs TalleyTV: Final Pretrial Hearing Reports

Thanks to Derrick J. Freeman and Bob Constantine for reporting on the final Pretrial Hearing that took place today in Cheshire County Superior Court. Above is today’s Fr33 Agents Radio report on the events today and Here is the report that Derrick filed at Fr33 Agents:

In the Shire, Peace Activist and Fr33 Agent Jason Talley of Talley.TV was arrested for the crime of possessing a video camera in a public courthouse. This is the first of two arrests at the Cheshire County Superior Court within the same year. He attended a pre-trial hearing for that arrest today.

Law-enforcer-turned-activist Brad Jardis represented TalleyTV. He was supported by a handful of activists who attended as well. All faced challenges to entering and recording the event, as the Cheshire County Superior Court is notorious for its abusive and arbitrary restrictions on freedom of the press. Due to a lack of foresight by the court, TalleyTV was faced with the undesirable options of pushing his trial back to April 2012 or selecting from a jury pool which had interacted with the court’s witnesses. He opted to select from a new jury pool and will attend trial for his victimless crime later this year.

Here’s what Bob had to say at the NH Underground:

Today there was a pre-trial hearing at Cheshire County Superior Court. It was brief. A woman judge (didn’t catch her name) presided and amongst the 17 persons who were scheduled for a hearing in the court room that day she selected Jason to go first. This may have been to make some space in the court room as the “public” seating contained many of Jason’s supporters and the free press present to witness or document the event.

The judge was already seated when Jason’s supporters and the free press entered so the “all rise” formalities were not an issue. Although a dangerous hat was demanded to be removed.

It appears upon complying with the proper court rules and paperwork filing that Brad Jardis will be allowed to represent Jason as his legal counsel. This involves filing a notarized affidavit and a declaration of good character etc. on Brad’s part.

Because three Cheshire County Superior Court bailiffs will be witnesses and two are directly involved in this case, the judge (perhaps prompted by the prosecutor? not sure if a motion was filed or not) moved the trial to April 2012. Apparently the court needs some time to ensure that other bailiffs will be available as the regular staff will be busy with their direct involvement in the case. That seemed to be a reasonable request so Jason did not object to the State / Court moving the trial ahead.

There was some talk of changing venue from Cheshire County Superior Court to another location. Jason mentioned his concern with his ability to get a fair trial at Cheshire County. I’m not sure if the change in venue will be granted or which location it might change to…will try to update as I find out.

A couple of deputies seemed concerned about people lingering and made sure to move people out of the court room and court house as quickly as possible. While the deputies could have been a bit more polite, all escaped without harm.

…stay tuned. Please feel free to post this post elsewhere if you are inclined to.

Read full story

Motion to Refrain From Authorizing Physical Force To Demand Respect

Read the motion in Google Docs or as a PDF.

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

CHESHIRE, SS                                 SUPERIOR COURT

Case No. 213-2011-CR-00216

State v.
Jason Talley

Motion to Refrain From Authorizing Physical Force To Demand Respect

Jason Talley moves this Honorable Court to refrain from ordering, authorizing, or condoning the use of physical force to demand respect for the judicial proceedings. In support of this motion, Jason states as follows:
1. It is a commonly understood ritual throughout the United States and beyond that while attending a judicial proceeding people stand when the Court and jury enter and exit the courtroom.
2. Many individuals find the practice of standing for a state official to be shocking to their conscience for political, ideological, religious, or other reasons.
3. The Cheshire County Superior Court has on prior occasion ordered law enforcement officers to use physical violence to force individuals who fall within #2 while in the courtroom to stand.
4. Part I, Article 4 of the New Hampshire Constitution reads:
Among the natural rights, some are, in their very nature unalienable, because no equivalent can be given or received for them. Of this kind are the Rights of Conscience.

Prayer for Relief
WHEREFORE, Jason Talley, requests this honorable Court grant the following relief:
Respect the right of individuals attending the proceedings to remain seated if they so choose; and
Grant any other relief this honorable Court deems just and proper.

Respectfully submitted,
Jason Talley

01/31/12 By
Bradley Jardis
42 Main Street #27
Dover, NH 03820

I hereby certify that on the above date, a copy of this motion was hand-delivered to Assistant Cheshire County Attorney John Webb.

Bradley Jardis

Read full story
Articles

State vs Talley.TV Defense Witness List

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

CHESHIRE, SS                                 SUPERIOR COURT

Case No. 213-2011-CR-00216

State v.
Jason Talley

Defense Witness List

Jason Talley informs the State and Honorable Court of his intent to call the following witnesses at trial:

1. Chief Judge Edwin Kelly, New Hampshire Circuit Court
2. Chief Judge Tina Nadeau, New Hampshire Superior Court
3. Presiding Judge Edward Burke, Keene Circuit Court
4. Adam Mueller
5. Kate Ager
6. Cecelia Fairchild

Respectfully submitted,
Jason Talley

01/31/12 By

Bradley Jardis
42 Main Street #27
Dover, NH 03820

I hereby certify that on the above date, a copy of this motion was hand-delivered to Assistant Cheshire County Attorney John Webb.

Bradley Jardis

View this as a PDF or Google Doc.

Read full story