Archive | February, 2012

NH: Jardis, reps suboena four judges in “abuse of activist” inquiry

Via Dave Ridley on the Free State Project Forum:

« on: Today at 12:50:29 pm »

I received some interesting messages from former New Hampshire police officer Brad Jardis on and around Feb. 29. He is moving forward his attempt to hold certain judges accountable for a series of controversial events in Keene. These involved Judge Edward Burke lying, getting caught on camera doing so, then having the cameraman arrested. Subsequently a second videographer was seized and his video confiscated for being in a courthouse lobby with a cam.

Here are the messages:

“The Cheshire County Superior Court Clerk refused to sign my subpoenas for 4 judges yesterday.

I’m headed to having a New Hampshire State Representative sign them, as they are also a Justice of the Peace.”

“Subpoenas issued for four judges: Circuit Court Administrative Judge Edwin Kelley, Superior Court Chief Judge Tina Nadeau, Keene Circuit Court-District Division Presiding Judge Edward Burke, and Cheshire County Superior Court Presiding Judge John Arnold.

The subpoenas were authorized by State Representative George Lambert, a Justice of the Peace.

Witnessing the subpoenas be issued was State Representative JR Hoell.”

More details should be appearing on FreeKeene.com soon.

Read full story
Video

Free Keene TV Interviews Brad Jardis about State vs. TalleyTV

Read full story

State vs. Talley.TV: Motion to Dismiss

This Motion to Dismiss was drafted by Brad Jardis and  is available as a PDF or as a Google Doc.

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

CHESHIRE, SS SUPERIOR COURT

Case No. 213-2011-CR-00216
State v.
Jason Talley

Motion to Dismiss

Jason Talley moves this Honorable Court to dismiss all charges pending in the matter of case number 213-2011-CR-00216 due to the fact that the charges in this case originiated from rules enacted specifically to cover up and prevent future media coverage of criminal conduct committed by New Hampshire Judicial Branch officials. In support of this motion, Jason states as follows:

1. The New Hampshire Constitution in Part I, Article 22 reads as follows:
Free speech and liberty of the press are essential to the security of freedom in a state: They ought, therefore, to be inviolably preserved. (emphasis added)

2. The Marriam-Webster Dictionary defines “inviolable” as:

secure from violation or profanation
or
secure from assault or trespass : unassailable

3. On June 28th 2011, independent journalist Adam Mueller of CopBlock.org attempted to interview Keene Circuit Court Presiding Judge Edward Burke about his decision to use taxpayer funds to imprison a peaceful individual who chose to protest a ban on wearing some kinds of hats while sitting in his courtroom. The conversation about public policy and its enforcement by a public official (the video of which is viewable in its entirety at www.CopBlock.org/ImproperInfluence) is as follows:

Adam Mueller: “Judge Burke, can I ask you a few questions about a hat, and how that constitutes contempt?”
Adam Mueller: “You think people want to pay for someone to be in jail for five days for wearing a hat?”
Adam Mueller: “It’s kind of rediculious to waste taxpayer money on something like that, isn’t it?”
Adam Mueller: “Sir, I just want to have a conversation.”
Judge Burke: “Bailiff! Bailiff! This person is threatening me about a decision I just made.”
Adam Mueller: “I’m not threatening you. I’m asking questions.”
Judge Burke: “He’s threatening.” *points to Adam* “That’s a criminal offense.”
Bailiff: “Come on, sir, you’re in custody.”

4. Mr. Mueller, a member of the free press who was acting as such, was imprisoned for two days on the aforementioned false allegations made by Judge Burke for two days prior to the Cheshire County Attorney dropping the charges.

5. New Hampshire law makes it a criminal offense to falsely report that another has committed a crime to law enforcement authorities. The law, False Reports to Law Enforcement, is codified at RSA 641:4 and reads:

A person is guilty of a misdemeanor if he:

I. Knowingly gives or causes to be given false information to any law enforcement officer with the purpose of inducing such officer to believe that another has committed an offense; or

6. As a result of Judge Burke being seen publicly on the Internet telling a lie which resulted in an innocent man and member of the media being imprisoned for two days (and his resulting criminal investigation which has still yet to be concluded by the Sullivan County Attorney), Circuit Court Chief Judge Edwin Kelley abused his authority granted by the New Hampshire Supreme Court pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 54 (which was granted to the Supreme Court originally by the people of the State of New Hampshire through Part II, Article 73-a of the New Hampshire Constitution) by enacting Circuit Court Order 2011-03 on July 1st 2011, not more than one day after Mr. Mueller was released from state custody. By doing so, Chief Judge Kelley stripped citizens of this state of their federal and state constitutional rights to hold government officials accountable for not only public acts, but criminal acts, committed in public areas of a public building.

7. Circuit Court Order 2011-03 itself was so bold as to state that members of the public had “accosted the presiding justice(,)” a reference undoubtedly to Judge Burke’s false statements three days prior about Mr. Mueller’s constitutionally protected conduct which ended with him falsely imprisoned for two days.

8. As a result of the embarrassment Judge Burke faced by being seen publicly on video telling a lie (and his resulting criminal investigation which has still yet to be concluded by the Sullivan County Attorney), Superior Court Chief Judge Tina Nadeau abused her authority granted by the New Hampshire Supreme Court pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 54 (which was granted to the Supreme Court originally by the people of the State of New Hampshire through Part II, Article 73-a of the New Hampshire Constitution) by enacting an order on July 1st 2011 that enforced the provisions of Circuit Court Chief Judge Kelley’s order upon the Superior Court system. By doing so, Chief Judge Nadeau stripped citizens of this state of their federal and state constitutional rights to hold government officials accountable for not only public acts, but criminal acts, committed in public areas of a public building.

9. Presiding Justice John Arnold of the Cheshire Superior Court further expanded the order adopted by Superior Court Chief Judge Nadeau by enacting “Order In Reference To Administrative Order 2011-3” on July 15th 2011. This order outright banned the possession of any device commonly used by the media to hold government officials who wield tremendous power accountable to the people from whom they derive their power.

11. The first court order adopted by Chief Judge Kelley served as the root of a now poisonous tree which restricts constitutional rights through a total of three court orders specifically immediately issued following a criminal act committed by a judge being caught on camera.
12. Were Cheshire County Superior Court Presiding Judge Arnold’s order not in effect on the date of Mr. Talley’s arrest, Mr. Talley never would have been arrested as the bailiffs would never have taken issue with the innocuous possession of a recording device.

13. Mr. Talley believes the judicial orders issued by New Hampshire’s two chief trial court judges and the Cheshire County Superior Court Presiding Judge John P. Arnold represent an abuse of the public trust as they constitute an effort on the part of the Judicial Branch of the State of New Hampshire to ensure that any future criminal acts which result in the deprivation of liberty on the part of a citizen of this state never be caught on camera again.

Prayer for Relief
WHEREFORE, Jason Talley, requests this honorable Court to order the following relief:

Dismiss all charges pending in this matter; and
Grant any other relief this honorable Court deems just and proper.

Respectfully submitted,
Jason Talley

01/31/12 By
Bradley Jardis
42 Main Street #27
Dover, NH 03820

I hereby certify that on the above date, a copy of this motion was hand-delivered to Assistant Cheshire County Attorney John Webb.

Bradley Jardis

Read full story

Impeachment Hearing for “Judge” John P. Arnold

On Tuesday, February 21st at the New Hampshire State House, members of the legislative branch will hold hearings about Judge John P. Arnold, a member of the State’s judicial branch. David Vandenberg has successfully gotten the grievance panel to schedule a hearing regarding the conduct of John P. Arnold, a senior Judge at the Cheshire County Superior Court. He’s the man in a flowing black gown who deemed your peaceful blogger “in contempt of court” before having me kidnapped and assaulted. Additionally the following events have been reported to #Fr33:

Arnold jails Jim Johnson indefinitely for refusing to fill out a court form, a clear violation of his fifth amendment right to not testify against himself.

On July 5th, 2011 – Superior court head judge Tina Nadeau orders all cameras, video, and audio recording devices banned from superior court and Arnold upholds it with another order specifically adding cell phones to the list of banned items.  In addition to  this is a clear violation of NH RSA 91-A:4 and Article 22 of the NH bill of rights.

On Juy 28th, 2011 – Arnold refuses to dismiss cases that have been sitting without action on the prosecutor’s part for over six months.  Defendant Ian Freeman never asked for continuance, so all delays were the court’s fault.  Prior to that, the case was in district court for six months.  Over a year before trial is scheduled, and Arnold thinks that’s a “speedy trial”.

Do you have a grievance against Judge Arnold? Contact talleytv@gmail.com or leave a voicemail at 678.TALLEYTV.

Read full story

State vs Talley.TV: Notification of Criminal Defense

Brad Jardis crafted and submitted the following today. It’s a requirement to share what our “defense” will be presenting to the jury. It’s available as a Google Doc and as a PDF.

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

CHESHIRE, SS SUPERIOR COURT

Case No. 213-2011-CR-00216
State v.
Jason Talley

Notification of Criminal Defense

Pursuant to Superior Court Rule 101, Jason Talley notifies this Honorable Court of the following criminal defense: Effect of Ignorance or Mistake (RSA 626:3).
The basis of the defense is as follows:

1. The New Hampshire Constitution in Part I, Article 22 reads as follows:
Free speech and liberty of the press are essential to the security of freedom in a state: They ought, therefore, to be inviolably preserved. (emphasis added)

2. The Marriam-Webster Dictionary defines “inviolable” as:
secure from violation or profanation
or
secure from assault or trespass : unassailable
3. RSA 626:3 reads in part:

II. A person is not relieved of criminal liability because he acts under a mistaken belief that his conduct does not, as a matter of law, constitute an offense unless his belief is founded upon a statement of the law contained in a statute or other enactment, or an administrative order or grant of permission, or a judicial decision of a state or federal court, or a written interpretation of the law relating to the offense officially made by a public servant, agency or body legally empowered with authority to administer, enforce or interpret such law. The defendant must prove a defense arising under this subsection by a preponderance of evidence. (Emphasis added)

4. Being aware of Part I, Article 22 of the New Hampshire Constitution, Mr. Talley believed that his conduct could not, as a matter of law, constitute an offense as it is an “inviolably preserved” constitutional right to hold public officials accountable for public acts in public places.

5. Mr. Talley was aware that on August 26th 2011 the First Federal Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that filming public officials in public spaces was a clearly established First Amendment right. ( See attached Glik v. Cunniffee, Savalis, Hall-Brewster, and City of Boston, MA – No 10-1764 ) In its order, the federal appeals court wrote:

“We conclude, based on the facts alleged, that Glik was exercising clearly established First Amendment rights in filming the officers in a public space, and that his clearly-established Fourth Amendment rights were violated by his arrest without probable cause.”

6. Bailiffs at the security checkpoint of the Cheshire County Superior Court are “officers” (see RSA 594:1-a) and a public building is a “public space.”

7. Mr. Talley intends to argue that stripping a constitutionally protected right as a result of criminal behavior by a government official (as detailed in the Motion to Dismiss) fails to be a compelling governmental interest which would justify the stripping of “inviolably preserved” rights within public areas of public court facilities.

Respectfully submitted,
Jason Talley

01/31/12 By
Bradley Jardis
42 Main Street #27
Dover, NH 03820

I hereby certify that on the above date, a copy of this motion was hand-delivered to Assistant Cheshire County Attorney John Webb.

Bradley Jardis

Read full story
Audio

State vs TalleyTV: Final Pretrial Hearing Reports

Thanks to Derrick J. Freeman and Bob Constantine for reporting on the final Pretrial Hearing that took place today in Cheshire County Superior Court. Above is today’s Fr33 Agents Radio report on the events today and Here is the report that Derrick filed at Fr33 Agents:

In the Shire, Peace Activist and Fr33 Agent Jason Talley of Talley.TV was arrested for the crime of possessing a video camera in a public courthouse. This is the first of two arrests at the Cheshire County Superior Court within the same year. He attended a pre-trial hearing for that arrest today.

Law-enforcer-turned-activist Brad Jardis represented TalleyTV. He was supported by a handful of activists who attended as well. All faced challenges to entering and recording the event, as the Cheshire County Superior Court is notorious for its abusive and arbitrary restrictions on freedom of the press. Due to a lack of foresight by the court, TalleyTV was faced with the undesirable options of pushing his trial back to April 2012 or selecting from a jury pool which had interacted with the court’s witnesses. He opted to select from a new jury pool and will attend trial for his victimless crime later this year.

Here’s what Bob had to say at the NH Underground:

Today there was a pre-trial hearing at Cheshire County Superior Court. It was brief. A woman judge (didn’t catch her name) presided and amongst the 17 persons who were scheduled for a hearing in the court room that day she selected Jason to go first. This may have been to make some space in the court room as the “public” seating contained many of Jason’s supporters and the free press present to witness or document the event.

The judge was already seated when Jason’s supporters and the free press entered so the “all rise” formalities were not an issue. Although a dangerous hat was demanded to be removed.

It appears upon complying with the proper court rules and paperwork filing that Brad Jardis will be allowed to represent Jason as his legal counsel. This involves filing a notarized affidavit and a declaration of good character etc. on Brad’s part.

Because three Cheshire County Superior Court bailiffs will be witnesses and two are directly involved in this case, the judge (perhaps prompted by the prosecutor? not sure if a motion was filed or not) moved the trial to April 2012. Apparently the court needs some time to ensure that other bailiffs will be available as the regular staff will be busy with their direct involvement in the case. That seemed to be a reasonable request so Jason did not object to the State / Court moving the trial ahead.

There was some talk of changing venue from Cheshire County Superior Court to another location. Jason mentioned his concern with his ability to get a fair trial at Cheshire County. I’m not sure if the change in venue will be granted or which location it might change to…will try to update as I find out.

A couple of deputies seemed concerned about people lingering and made sure to move people out of the court room and court house as quickly as possible. While the deputies could have been a bit more polite, all escaped without harm.

…stay tuned. Please feel free to post this post elsewhere if you are inclined to.

Read full story

Motion to Refrain From Authorizing Physical Force To Demand Respect

Read the motion in Google Docs or as a PDF.

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

CHESHIRE, SS                                 SUPERIOR COURT

Case No. 213-2011-CR-00216

State v.
Jason Talley

Motion to Refrain From Authorizing Physical Force To Demand Respect

Jason Talley moves this Honorable Court to refrain from ordering, authorizing, or condoning the use of physical force to demand respect for the judicial proceedings. In support of this motion, Jason states as follows:
1. It is a commonly understood ritual throughout the United States and beyond that while attending a judicial proceeding people stand when the Court and jury enter and exit the courtroom.
2. Many individuals find the practice of standing for a state official to be shocking to their conscience for political, ideological, religious, or other reasons.
3. The Cheshire County Superior Court has on prior occasion ordered law enforcement officers to use physical violence to force individuals who fall within #2 while in the courtroom to stand.
4. Part I, Article 4 of the New Hampshire Constitution reads:
Among the natural rights, some are, in their very nature unalienable, because no equivalent can be given or received for them. Of this kind are the Rights of Conscience.

Prayer for Relief
WHEREFORE, Jason Talley, requests this honorable Court grant the following relief:
Respect the right of individuals attending the proceedings to remain seated if they so choose; and
Grant any other relief this honorable Court deems just and proper.

Respectfully submitted,
Jason Talley

01/31/12 By
Bradley Jardis
42 Main Street #27
Dover, NH 03820

I hereby certify that on the above date, a copy of this motion was hand-delivered to Assistant Cheshire County Attorney John Webb.

Bradley Jardis

Read full story
Articles

State vs Talley.TV Defense Witness List

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

CHESHIRE, SS                                 SUPERIOR COURT

Case No. 213-2011-CR-00216

State v.
Jason Talley

Defense Witness List

Jason Talley informs the State and Honorable Court of his intent to call the following witnesses at trial:

1. Chief Judge Edwin Kelly, New Hampshire Circuit Court
2. Chief Judge Tina Nadeau, New Hampshire Superior Court
3. Presiding Judge Edward Burke, Keene Circuit Court
4. Adam Mueller
5. Kate Ager
6. Cecelia Fairchild

Respectfully submitted,
Jason Talley

01/31/12 By

Bradley Jardis
42 Main Street #27
Dover, NH 03820

I hereby certify that on the above date, a copy of this motion was hand-delivered to Assistant Cheshire County Attorney John Webb.

Bradley Jardis

View this as a PDF or Google Doc.

Read full story